New user registration is currently closed         PMLog in for PM  Log inLog in 

My impressions after watching Robocop 3
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    INDEX -> The Big Robo topics
Author Message
Edd 209
C-L1

C-L1



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Post Count: 1015


Comment: EMU 209 // We have the future Down Under control...

News Topic Level 3/3 (Amount: 1) Great Topic  Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Robofan Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Posts  Level 1/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 11:55 pm Reply with quote

artuditu :
Yes, R1 we liked it when we were kids because it was the coolest thing on earth, not because of social satire, american christ or the odyssey of the human soul (even if at an unconscious level I think we were getting the odd messages more than we realize), but that is why I think is the film of a lifetime for me, because it has the ability to pass the test of time and adulthood, and my favorite movies today include those that I have been able to enjoy both being a kid, teenager and adult, which are not all the ones I loved in the past, many have been left behind, because they were just "exploitation" films for immature and underdeveloped minds (aka children & teens) avid of action, violence, cool looking robots, guns, aliens, monsters, martial arts... While some were smarter and very well crafted, like Robocop, Aliens, Predator, Terminator, Total Recall, First Blood etc. many others were cheesy, dumb and lazy as hell, and then yes there is a grey area of movies in between, but can't see how R3 belongs there at all. At least this is how I've ended up seeing things, I can always change my mind in the future.


^ This.
when I first watched R1 it was the movie of all movies. Always will be. Had every element of a movie I need. And since the first viewing then you begin to keep learning more and more things about it and is why it makes it great - so much going on under the surface.

artuditu :
Getting back strictly to R3, I think Burke is a good helmetless Robo/Murphy, but he is terrible with the helmet on when talking opening the mouth so widely, he moves painfully slow, like retarded slow, and the screenplay makes Robo useless in every crucial action scene, he gets his ass kicked instead of protecting Lewis, he gets his ass kicked by the first otomo, who's playing with him, it's just luck he can reach the gunarm to win; and finally the 90's child has to save his ass at the end of the movie with some computer magic...


Oh c'mon he did catch a bullet! Laughing oh dear Happy robo
_________________
Roobocop // The future of Australian justice...




RB 4892


Ed-260
RoboWags
Ultra Police Watch Commander

L-L1



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Post Count: 424


Comment: "Its time to show how real cops kick ass."

Great Robofan Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Topic  Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Work Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Posts  Level 1/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:17 am Reply with quote

RoboBrand87 :
Never seen the Alpha Commando series.

You aren't missing much. :roll:
_________________




RB 2728


ultra1 ultra2 lewis-figure2 game-nes1 sprite-robocop1 award comic1-robocop
Stan The Man
Bah Concepts Division

OCP4 - L1



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 05 Jun 2003
Post Count: 7020


Comment: I'm the guy in Old Archive.

Great Topic  Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) News Topic Level 2/3 (Amount: 1) Great Robofan Level 3/3 (Amount: 1) Public Trust - Level 1/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 6:45 am Reply with quote

artuditu :
I took for granted the consensus among fans from some years ago, and how different things are now! So, despite getting older we now give R3 more praise than R2? I'm speechless Laughing


More praise.. yes perhaps. More than R2? Fat chance man. At least from me. I may dislike R3 less nowadays but that ain't at the expense of R2 and it's muddied awesomeness, I assure you. End of the day, you can still count on me there! Wink

Quote:
I think R3 having a few aesthetic elements more reminiscent of R1, such as music, suit color, police department,... is no more than makeup, while the story, tone and soul of the movie is nothing like R1, it's just a few superficial elements we found pleasing when we were kids, but nothing more. I mean I like Poledouris soundtrack for Conan the Destroyer, but that doesn't make it a good film, and even the soundtracks in both cases are much less inspired than the originals for R1 and Barbarian.

For the story, I've always liked the Delta City arc, but the resolution in R3 is not satisfying if you are not an early teenager. I mean, homeless rebels joining forces with cops to have an open battle against rehabs, tanks and punks in the streets? Not the definition of subtle or smart... More like a teenage fantasy, so far from the adult thinking behind R1.

I'm not saying the idea of making Robo a kind of socialist warrior against corporations is bad in itself, it has some potential, he sees injustice and acts defending the weaker against the powerful and the authority, I can see the dilemma and moral implications, but the ultimate execution of that conflict in the movie is just like a fairy tale on steroids, not a coincidence that Robo ends up flying like Superman to save the people.

Was I moved being 9-10 years old? Yes, it was exciting to see Robo being the superhero, and the good cops like Reed joining the abused people, and I even feel now some nostalgia of those past emotions, but I'm no more a kid, I can compare R3 with so many other movies, and saying it is an 7 or 8 out of 10 I think is not doing a favor to R1, which is genuinely a good movie that attracts praise and attention, with a good IMDB rating of 7.5, while R3 has a 3.9... We're not talking about a 6 or 5-something film we claim is better than it's given credit for, we're talking about a 3.9...


Well I gave a 6.5 and that was most generous for sure. Of course that is with a perfect 10 for Robo (would equate to 4.8 or so if you wanna put R1 as 7.5 - again, still rather generous by comparison but not quite as high to meet your point, though barely, admittedly) That said, I wonder what criteria those people have for a perfect 10 anyway.. Actually I don't, I don't care. tongue

I do feel at this point it doesn't deserve to be quite as hated as it once was, yes. But I have always said the same for R2 which many consider just as terrible a film. Like, opinions, man.

That said, you have superbly elaborated more-or-less my own main view of R3, which I had condensed earlier in saying it's not as reverent. It takes a safe route and imitates what worked rather than try different things as R2 did and which I give it more credit for. Sure younger it seems cool but even then it wasn't anywhere NEAR the level of R1 for me then, and still isn't now. I give it the 6.5 as saying it's mostly average, maybe with some above spots because that's how I view it now. As you noted though, that view can and likely will be subject to change. But again, rest assured it will still always be lower than R2 and never near R1 for me. The gap has perhaps narrowed a bit, but still.

Quote:
Yes, R1 we liked it when we were kids because it was the coolest thing on earth, not because of social satire, american christ or the odyssey of the human soul (even if at an unconscious level I think we were getting the odd messages more than we realize), but that is why I think is the film of a lifetime for me, because it has the ability to pass the test of time and adulthood, and my favorite movies today include those that I have been able to enjoy both being a kid, teenager and adult, which are not all the ones I loved in the past, many have been left behind, because they were just "exploitation" films for immature and underdeveloped minds (aka children & teens) avid of action, violence, cool looking robots, guns, aliens, monsters, martial arts... While some were smarter and very well crafted, like Robocop, Aliens, Predator, Terminator, Total Recall, First Blood etc. many others were cheesy, dumb and lazy as hell, and then yes there is a grey area of movies in between, but can't see how R3 belongs there at all. At least this is how I've ended up seeing things, I can always change my mind in the future.


Beautifully stated. I'm with Edd, RoboCop was and remains for me a perfect film, it has only gotten better and stronger with time, very few movies can even make that claim, let alone actually rate it. I loved it when I first saw it, and still love it today.

Otherwise, again, at the end of the day, I have to agree. I wouldn't put R3 in either of those two categories either. It might be closer to 'grey area' than it once was, but still, not quite there. R2 fits closer to the 'grey area' for me. Always did. Still does.

Quote:
Getting back strictly to R3, I think Burke is a good helmetless Robo/Murphy, but he is terrible with the helmet on when talking opening the mouth so widely, he moves painfully slow, like retarded slow, and the screenplay makes Robo useless in every crucial action scene, he gets his ass kicked instead of protecting Lewis, he gets his ass kicked by the first otomo, who's playing with him, it's just luck he can reach the gunarm to win; and finally the 90's child has to save his ass at the end of the movie with some computer magic...


Pretty much concur, as I said already. I also agree Robo was a real pussy in R3, not like the original or R2 at all. Hell in the Series I think Robo maybe wasn't quite as useless even, bah.
_________________
I don't wanna pay that, PhotoBucket. Now maybe you haven't heard, but I'm the guy in old Archive. So hows about you just shit snow for a year and I'll figure out something else. Sayonara!




RB 52679


AirWolf OCP-stock ED-209-3D auto9 cobragun robocop3-gunarm alien-pulse-rifle Gun-T2 Mini Gun
KidGoesWild
L-L3

L-L3



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Post Count: 663


Comment: I type it, you think it

RoboCop2 fan (Amount: 1) Great Robofan Level 2/3 (Amount: 1) Great Topic  Level 3/3 (Amount: 1) Great Posts  Level 3/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 11:50 pm Reply with quote

Its not even that he was useless, as that he was completely characterless which was the script's fault and Dekker's direction. That was and still is my biggest gripe with R3, the complete lack of emotions and humanity in robo in R3


_____________________________

http://robocopmovies.blogspot.com/




RB 525


dvd-robocop2 prototype-figure2 prototype-figure1
RoboPimp
PIMPY SUPREME

CH-L1



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Post Count: 3124


Comment: "You dead wrong if ya think that pimpin' gon' die" - Snoop Dogg, P.I.M.P. (Remix)

Public Trust - Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Topic  Level 2/3 (Amount: 1) Great Posts  Level 2/3 (Amount: 1) News Topic Level 1/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 12:54 am Reply with quote

KidGoesWild :
Its not even that he was useless, as that he was completely characterless which was the script's fault and Dekker's direction. That was and still is my biggest gripe with R3, the complete lack of emotions and humanity in robo in R3


It seems most people expect every version of Robocop to have more humanity and emotion than the last. However, if you watch or read anything beyond the first movie you will see that is not truly his character's arc. I have posed this theory before, but to briefly reiterate, it is my belief that Robocop actually becomes less human as time goes on. The ending of Robocop is a brief glimpse of what he could have been, not what he was truly becoming. I pose that as time goes on and his organics deteriorate more and more, the robotic side of him takes over, until it is basically a computer programs simulating Murphy's conscience. This would explain how he grows less serious and human over time and becomes more silly and detached. This is the only way I can see fitting some of his later adventures into the canon. Of course, I am probably the only one who is trying to get Alpha Commando and RvT Kill Human into a canonical timeline, but still. I think Muprhy's humanity peaked at the end of the first Robocop and what we see in Robocop 2 and 3 is the deterioration of that humanity. By the time of Robocop 3 he still has a shred of Murphy in him for sure, but a lot of his behavior is erratic and uncharacteristic of both the original Robocop and Murphy as a human officer. Was the real reason for these changes because of the PG-13 rating and a writer/director not suitable for the character? Probably, but I prefer to think its all intentional. And since the vast majority of Robocop stories feature a PG or PG-13 version of the character, you must ask yourself who is the real Robocop?




RB 1658


robocop-helmet robopimp-helmet
KidGoesWild
L-L3

L-L3



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Post Count: 663


Comment: I type it, you think it

RoboCop2 fan (Amount: 1) Great Topic  Level 3/3 (Amount: 1) Great Posts  Level 3/3 (Amount: 1) Great Robofan Level 2/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:22 am Reply with quote

Well pimp, youre theory is good and quite frankly, its the only theory that makes sense of the whole situation and in universe explains why in R3 Murphys no more. As far as R2, I see him more as cold and full of boiling anger, along with depression (most of the movie he speaks very softly and quietly), which novelization makes clearer, rather than being less human, but most people see it the other way from what I read


Im gearing up to watch R3 again, I havent seen it in at least two years. Its just everytime I do see it, it leaves such a bad taste in my mouth, its so childish I literally feel embarrassed Im watching it as an adult, Im not trying to be mean, thats the truth. I really did try to like it many times, but...

_____________________________

http://robocopmovies.blogspot.com/




RB 525


dvd-robocop2 prototype-figure2 prototype-figure1
TODD-209
Sgt-L1

Sgt-L1



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Post Count: 192




Great Robofan Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) News Topic Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Posts  Level 1/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:40 am Reply with quote

I've been contemplating the devolution of the character of RoboCop, as it were, over the course of the two film sequels, and it just occurred to me how meta the scene is in RoboCop 2 where OCP is meeting with the panel of state and local representatives and what-have-you, and they start discussing how RoboCop can be more family-oriented or kid-friendly and not so violent...in retrospect it's like watching a studio think-tank discussing how to proceed with a PG-version of the next RoboCop sequel...which is what we actually got with RoboCop 3. I had never considered how self-fulfilling or predictive that scene was until just now...



RB 1633


ultra4
Edd 209
C-L1

C-L1



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Post Count: 1015


Comment: EMU 209 // We have the future Down Under control...

Great Robofan Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) News Topic Level 3/3 (Amount: 1) Great Topic  Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Posts  Level 1/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:46 pm Reply with quote

TODD-209 :
I've been contemplating the devolution of the character of RoboCop, as it were, over the course of the two film sequels, and it just occurred to me how meta the scene is in RoboCop 2 where OCP is meeting with the panel of state and local representatives and what-have-you, and they start discussing how RoboCop can be more family-oriented or kid-friendly and not so violent...in retrospect it's like watching a studio think-tank discussing how to proceed with a PG-version of the next RoboCop sequel...which is what we actually got with RoboCop 3. I had never considered how self-fulfilling or predictive that scene was until just now...


Definitely. And then Robocop carries out certain things - turning off the water, stopping a smoker smoking... It didn't work and he had to electrocute himself! Murphy saw then how the future was to turn bleak haha!
_________________
Roobocop // The future of Australian justice...




RB 4892


Ed-260
NOF
O-L1

O-L1



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 20 Jan 2009
Post Count: 61


Comment: Who told you how?

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:50 am Reply with quote

It's not the worst film in the world, but it could have been much more.

I've always really liked the story of Robocop 3 (Murphy becomes a freedom fighter against the corporation that created him) and I think that, if the script had been more carefully written and the direction more specific, it would have been the perfect way to end the trilogy. It would have been (to me) a natural progression for Murphy:

R1 - Comes into being.
R2 - Struggles to adjust to his self
R3 - Accepts who he is and uses it to fight for good

The one scene that should have tied these strands together is the shootout at the church. With him looking back and forth between the rebels and McDaggatt while his prime directives are going crazy, it could have been a moment where he realises that this was his chance to finally take on OCP. Instead, the final film portrays it in a rather simplistic fashion.

Admittedly, this doesn't quite tie in with the previously mentioned notion of him losing his humanity, which is something that could have been explored in another film, where his detective skills are focused on to make up for the lack of internal wrangling.




RB 534


comic2-robocop game-xbox arcade2-robocop2 Doom robocop3-fanboy
RoboDemise
What's all this then?

DC-L1



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 30 Jun 2009
Post Count: 2163


Comment: I come from hell

Public Trust - Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Topic  Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Work Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Robofan Level 1/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:00 am Reply with quote

What is your problem sucka?! Uhhh, I mean officer...



RB 9924


robo-scraped AClockworkOrange Stern-Sirius prototype-figure2
RoboBabylonAD
The Kid Goes Wild

Sgt-L4



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Post Count: 326


Comment: Angry and Young...Under the Gun...

Great Robofan Level 1/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 3:07 am Reply with quote

There actually isn't a devolution to RoboCop's character over the course of the trilogy at all.

The thing to understand is that when Murphy becomes RoboCop, he becomes an entity unto himself. He's no longer a man but he's not just a machine either. He's something more. He's unique.

And this struggle between the two manifests itself in quite a few fascinating ways throughout the trilogy.

This is how I break it down, personally:

----

"RoboCop"

In the first film, Alex Murphy is human, certainly. Once he's gunned down and integrated into the RoboCop program by Security Concepts, the intention is to create an automated police officer under corporate control...but unlike ED-209, RoboCop utilizes a police officer's skill set, sense of judgment and commitment to duty.

So naturally, this combination begins to work with RoboCop, cleaning up Old Detroit to make way for Delta City's construction.

But over the course of the film, remnants of Murphy's previous life interfere as he breaks through the programming and eventually by the end of the film, Murphy has reemerged...albeit he still abides by the Prime Directives, meaning he's still bound to the programming.

"RoboCop 2"

While Murphy's humanity has been reclaimed to some extent, RoboCop is still the dominant personality.

This is where we begin to see the reality of the spine of this trilogy: The conflict between man and machine internalized in the same being.

While OCP has made efforts to force the Police to strike in order to step up the timetable on Delta City, RoboCop's still operating under the Prime Directives and that combined with Murphy's sense of duty keeps him on the streets. He has no choice where the strike is concerned and has to proceed accordingly, while others like Lewis continue to work out of responsibility.

In reclaiming his humanity from the first film, this leads Murphy to stalk his family...a yearning to reconnect with them and try and get them back. But he's convinced and coerced into thinking it's for the best that they be left to move on with their lives so RoboCop severs any attachment to Murphy's wife.

But this isn't enough for OCP, who sees Murphy's situation as a liability they can't afford. First, it's him spying on his family...but then who knows what he's prone to do, including standing in the way of their own plans should he find out their involvement in the strike and the resulting spike in crime. So that begins the RoboCop 2 program to find a suitable replacement that can be more easily controlled than Murphy...and that control obviously manifests in the form of Cain and his drug addiction.

With RoboCop's attempt to kill Cain thwarted and his disassembly, OCP recognizes that with RoboCop out of the way, their chances of Detroit defaulting on their payments so they can seize the city uncontested through foreclosure are better.

Dr. Faxx is then tasked with inhibiting Murphy's humanity by feeding him so many directives that he becomes little more than an ineffective PR slave for OCP.

So this is an example of OCP recognizing Murphy's humanity and his willingness for that humanity to compel his actions as something to suppress. We get that great scene where Faxx questions RoboCop as to what he thinks he is...and like the scene with his wife, he's once again manipulated into disavowing his humanity...disavowing Murphy...in favor of being RoboCop.

"RoboCop 2" is the story of Murphy being constantly buried in favor of RoboCop...but despite all of OCP's efforts, they fail...with his assurance to Lewis at the end that "we're only human."

One element of the story that I feel could've been made clearer is that when RoboCop fries himself to wipe out Faxx's Directives, he wipes out EVERYTHING...meaning that from that point on when he convinces the cops to go after Cain, Murphy is in 100% control.

Because that's the thru-line of the trilogy is how much of this being is the RoboCop programming and how much of it is Alex Murphy...and the films go back and forth as to which is the case.

But this brings us to a realization in the final film.

"RoboCop 3"

As the film opens, RoboCop's Prime Directives have been reestablished along with Directive 4. Even so, Murphy is very much still present as RoboCop is shown making judgment calls such as abandoning the pursuit of Bertha and the Rebels to save Lewis.

Again, this is an issue for OCP. They have a product created by them that's meant to suit their needs and yet Murphy's humanity is a factor inhibiting that from happening.

When the CEO determines he wants RoboCop to be implemented into the Rehabs, Mr. Fleck takes the extreme measure of demanding Murphy's humanity be erased once and for all so that RoboCop can be utilized accordingly to eliminate the rebel threat, clear Cadillac Heights for demolition and save OCP from bankruptcy...which the buy out by Kanemitsu hasn't managed to do...by allowing Delta City to be constructed.

Of course Dr. Lazarus doesn't carry this out and Murphy's allowed to retain his humanity...and this leads OCP to perpetuate a smear campaign once Murphy sides with the Rebels given Lewis's death at the hands of the Rehabs.

The one scene that to me really hits home the idea that RoboCop actually grows as a character is the scene between he and Nikko once Lazarus has fixed his heart and repaired him.

From the very first film and in distinct flashbacks, we're shown that Murphy can recall his family...his pain, his loss, his suffering.

We're shown in scenes that he mourns what was taken from him and the fact that he can never go back. So he differentiates between Murphy and RoboCop. In the first film when he takes his helmet off, he refers to Murphy in the third person...in the second film, he's asked if he's Alex Murphy and is coerced on tape to admit that he's not...and in the third film, Nikko asks RoboCop if Murphy is his name, to which he replies "it was before."

But in this scene between him and Nikko, he discovers in his files that her parents are dead. Then we get this exchange:

"Your parents. You miss them?"
"Yeah."
"But you remember them. Because...if you remember them...they're never really gone."

This is the moment where Murphy learns from his own recollections of his family...and uses that idea of remembering NOT to pity himself or for HIS sake...but to comfort ANOTHER...to recognize someone ELSE's pain and loss and empathize with them, connect with them.

Now this next part is somewhat lost in translation but can be seen more clearly in the Avatar Comics adaptation of Frank Miller's screenplay:

At a certain turning point, RoboCop is disassembled and it's explained to him by the spirit or whatever of Dr. Marie Lacasse this very important epiphany...

That he is neither Alex Murphy OR RoboCop...but that he is BOTH simultaneously. He is no longer a man but not simply a machine.

This entire trilogy has been about Murphy either mourning what he's lost (Man) or being burdened and consumed by what OCP thinks he is (Machine).

In the comic, as this is laid out, RoboCop is rebuilt and given the ability to fly, hence the flight pack in the film version.

It's truncated in the movie, but it becomes this great symbol in the comics of evolution. Of the caterpillar becoming the butterfly.

Over the course of the trilogy, RoboCop transcends his lost human side and his oppressive machine side by embracing BOTH sides. No longer plagued with internal conflict over his own existence, he finds peace in assuming his rightful mantle as both man AND machine.

That, to me, is why the final line in "RoboCop 3" is "My friends call me Murphy. You call me RoboCop."

He's no longer tortured by what he's lost and he's no longer conflicted about what he's become.

This is a declaration to both his friends and allies AND to his enemies and anyone who would stand up to challenge him.

It's a way of saying "I'll never forget who I was, but this is who I am now" and it behaves like a cathartic, psychological reckoning.

----

So the spine of the series is really this back and forth between man and machine and ultimately realizing it's for naught because RoboCop is both...and the trilogy is about him coming to terms with that.

This is also interestingly paralleled in his main villains from movie to movie.

While ED-209 is still an antagonist, it's little more than a tool...so that said, the first film has main villains that are purely human (Clarence Boddicker and Dick Jones).

"RoboCop 2" has a main villain that starts as a man (Cain) who then becomes a machine (RoboCop 2).

"RoboCop 3" has a main villain that's a machine but bears the appearance of a man (Otomo).

So the entire trilogy is populated with characters that are either men or machines or men who become machines or machines disguised as men and these two sides of the coin all culminate in one character...the title character...and his journey to becoming one with those two sides.

That's how I see it personally.




RB 353


robocop-figure3 robocop-helmet auto9 nuke-red-ramrod robocop3-gunarm dvd-robocop1 dvd-robocop2 dvd-robocop3
RoboJOF
Sgt-L4

Sgt-L4



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 17 May 2015
Post Count: 306


Comment: Bitches, leave!

Great Posts  Level 2/3 (Amount: 1) Great Robofan Level 1/3 (Amount: 1) Great Topic  Level 2/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 10:44 pm Reply with quote

RoboBabylonAD :


Now this next part is somewhat lost in translation but can be seen more clearly in the Avatar Comics adaptation of Frank Miller's screenplay:

At a certain turning point, RoboCop is disassembled and it's explained to him by the spirit or whatever of Dr. Marie Lacasse this very important epiphany...

That he is neither Alex Murphy OR RoboCop...but that he is BOTH simultaneously. He is no longer a man but not simply a machine.

This entire trilogy has been about Murphy either mourning what he's lost (Man) or being burdened and consumed by what OCP thinks he is (Machine).



This comment made me think of something in a different way. All this time I have thought about Robocop as a character who was resurrected and had to get his identity back, but maybe its not quite that way. Maybe Robocop is neither Murphy or a machine, but a machine that has awareness of his programming and interference of the memories and remnants of Murphy's soul that somehow got stuck in the machine's technology. As a result, Robocop is trying to make sense of the programming and human feelings that get in the way. It may be similar to someone with amnesia, not being able to remember his past. Even in that pivotal scene at the end of the first movie, where Robocop refers to himself as "Murphy" when he saves the old man, may have been a sophisticated machine faking it because it seems right in some way. It would be consistent with the scene in Robocop 2 when he convinces his wife that "they made this to honor him," which I always thought was his way of turning her away, but in this case could be evidence that Robocop is admitting that he is not Murphy despite having his face and tells her what he truly thinks of it all.
I am still of the mind that Murphy is still alive in the machine, and as interesting as this line of thinking is, I think that it is a more compelling story (to have him reclaim his humanity despite being made into a machine). I also think that it humanizes the character and allows him to develop over time (as he has in all three movies). I am just still wondering: is it real?




RB 1747


transformers-mega Voltron sprite-robocop1 arcade1-robocop magnavolt metroid-figure2
RoboBabylonAD
The Kid Goes Wild

Sgt-L4



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Post Count: 326


Comment: Angry and Young...Under the Gun...

Great Robofan Level 1/3 (Amount: 1)
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2019 12:17 am Reply with quote

RoboJOF :
This comment made me think of something in a different way. All this time I have thought about Robocop as a character who was resurrected and had to get his identity back, but maybe its not quite that way. Maybe Robocop is neither Murphy or a machine, but a machine that has awareness of his programming and interference of the memories and remnants of Murphy's soul that somehow got stuck in the machine's technology. As a result, Robocop is trying to make sense of the programming and human feelings that get in the way. It may be similar to someone with amnesia, not being able to remember his past. Even in that pivotal scene at the end of the first movie, where Robocop refers to himself as "Murphy" when he saves the old man, may have been a sophisticated machine faking it because it seems right in some way. It would be consistent with the scene in Robocop 2 when he convinces his wife that "they made this to honor him," which I always thought was his way of turning her away, but in this case could be evidence that Robocop is admitting that he is not Murphy despite having his face and tells her what he truly thinks of it all.
I am still of the mind that Murphy is still alive in the machine, and as interesting as this line of thinking is, I think that it is a more compelling story (to have him reclaim his humanity despite being made into a machine). I also think that it humanizes the character and allows him to develop over time (as he has in all three movies). I am just still wondering: is it real?


I think Murphy is still alive in the machine too. I just feel like once that tinge of humanity comes back at the end of the first film, it starts to be not as black and white as the other characters around him make it out to be.

In the first film it's Bob Morton and Dick Jones who insist RoboCop is merely product. In "2," it's Holzgang and Dr. Faxx that say as much in the beginning with RoboCop's taped testimony and the scene when Faxx has RoboCop reprogrammed with all the Directives. And in "3," you have that distinction made by Mr. Fleck when he orders Dr. Lazarus to wipe his memories.

All the corporate suits refer to RoboCop as a machine...a product..."nothing more."

Then on the flip side, all the good guys refer to him by name. He's Murphy. And they act as if he's still the Murphy they all knew.

But I think ultimately neither is the whole truth. He's a hybrid of the two. And it just gets really fascinating to consider that possibility.




RB 353


robocop-figure3 robocop-helmet auto9 nuke-red-ramrod robocop3-gunarm dvd-robocop1 dvd-robocop2 dvd-robocop3
OcpCommunications
R-L1

R-L1



View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 18 Dec 2019
Post Count: 5


Comment: "The only choice."

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:48 am Reply with quote

My impressions after watching RoboCop 3? Well that was fucking lame. Short and succint but to the point and true to how I feel about the film. I know there are people who like it. And to each their own, but to me it is a mistake. Just like the PG-13 rating. Instead of putting the franchise on life support, they should have pulled the plug or started work on The Series a year early.

Because to me personally, RoboCop: The Series is the family friendly RoboCop that RoboCop 3 tried to be and failed. It takes the lack of ultra violence and uses creativity to lessen the blow of its absence dramatically something that R3 sorely lacked. Plus Richard Eden was genuinely great in the role as Murphy/RoboCop and the scripts allowed Murphy to have more character development than ever before as the series would unfold.

That jet pack scene is still pretty cool though. And I like Basil's score.




RB 64


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RoboCop Archive Forum Index -> The Big Robo topics All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18

Download Topic

Jump to:  









The RoboCop Archive Messageboard
Powered by Omni Consumer Products and the phpBB Group