RoboCop pushed back to 2014

[BurnOne4Robo]

[Joined]

[Post Count]

[Bauc]

In the mean time, here is another view of the CC video

http://www.totalfilm.com/features/robocop-2014-10-things-we-learned-at-comic-con-2013/there-are-also-nods-to-the-original-s-weapons-and-voice

[Joined]

In the mean time, here is another view of the CC video

http://www.totalfilm.com/features/robocop-2014-10-things-we-learned-at-comic-con-2013/there-are-also-nods-to-the-original-s-weapons-and-voice

[Post Count]

In the mean time, here is another view of the CC video

http://www.totalfilm.com/features/robocop-2014-10-things-we-learned-at-comic-con-2013/there-are-also-nods-to-the-original-s-weapons-and-voice

[Comment]

In the mean time, here is another view of the CC video

http://www.totalfilm.com/features/robocop-2014-10-things-we-learned-at-comic-con-2013/there-are-also-nods-to-the-original-s-weapons-and-voice

[Raymond]

It's crazy how close they are to the drone controversy with stuff like

[Joined]

It's crazy how close they are to the drone controversy with stuff like

[Post Count]

It's crazy how close they are to the drone controversy with stuff like

[artuditu]

I'm sure it would be easy to make the film not to mention Iran/Tehran and make of it a nameless city and country in Middle East.

I've read about 'Red Dawn' remake and how they changed the invading army in post-production from China to North Korea (they had to retouch flags and symbols digitally, and redub dialogues to korean) so they could distribute the film in the chinese market.

By the way, seeing it today it's a bit weird, funny and out of place in R1 when they mention Mexico and South Africa in the news. Obviously those examples weren't that much sensitive as conflicts in Middle East today, specially among American audience.

[Joined]

I'm sure it would be easy to make the film not to mention Iran/Tehran and make of it a nameless city and country in Middle East.

I've read about 'Red Dawn' remake and how they changed the invading army in post-production from China to North Korea (they had to retouch flags and symbols digitally, and redub dialogues to korean) so they could distribute the film in the chinese market.

By the way, seeing it today it's a bit weird, funny and out of place in R1 when they mention Mexico and South Africa in the news. Obviously those examples weren't that much sensitive as conflicts in Middle East today, specially among American audience.

[Post Count]

I'm sure it would be easy to make the film not to mention Iran/Tehran and make of it a nameless city and country in Middle East.

I've read about 'Red Dawn' remake and how they changed the invading army in post-production from China to North Korea (they had to retouch flags and symbols digitally, and redub dialogues to korean) so they could distribute the film in the chinese market.

By the way, seeing it today it's a bit weird, funny and out of place in R1 when they mention Mexico and South Africa in the news. Obviously those examples weren't that much sensitive as conflicts in Middle East today, specially among American audience.

[Comment]

I'm sure it would be easy to make the film not to mention Iran/Tehran and make of it a nameless city and country in Middle East.

I've read about 'Red Dawn' remake and how they changed the invading army in post-production from China to North Korea (they had to retouch flags and symbols digitally, and redub dialogues to korean) so they could distribute the film in the chinese market.

By the way, seeing it today it's a bit weird, funny and out of place in R1 when they mention Mexico and South Africa in the news. Obviously those examples weren't that much sensitive as conflicts in Middle East today, specially among American audience.

[Raymond]

[Joined]

[Post Count]

[Saasouza]

I think the drone warfare is the best scenario they could have possibly use if they're trying to remain faithful to the original movie beacuse it's basically the same thing, difference is that we know better now how this is going to happen..

like Padilha have said, if we come to the point of using automate machines as military force, it is more reasonable to assume they're deploying them in global interventions as opposed to use them as law enforcement domestically and risking the life of their own citizen.

The way i see this is not even a change in the film's plot - it's more like having a better notion about that subject matter and make use of the current drone debate to make the story they're telling more grounded.

Iran is just a perfect choice as well since the tension between us and iran have escalated more and more in the past years and since the movie happens in the future it's better to avoid the afghanistan - pakistan theme and try to come up with a possible conflict scenario based on a growing crisis scenario that's happening in the present.

[Joined]

I think the drone warfare is the best scenario they could have possibly use if they're trying to remain faithful to the original movie beacuse it's basically the same thing, difference is that we know better now how this is going to happen..

like Padilha have said, if we come to the point of using automate machines as military force, it is more reasonable to assume they're deploying them in global interventions as opposed to use them as law enforcement domestically and risking the life of their own citizen.

The way i see this is not even a change in the film's plot - it's more like having a better notion about that subject matter and make use of the current drone debate to make the story they're telling more grounded.

Iran is just a perfect choice as well since the tension between us and iran have escalated more and more in the past years and since the movie happens in the future it's better to avoid the afghanistan - pakistan theme and try to come up with a possible conflict scenario based on a growing crisis scenario that's happening in the present.

[Post Count]

I think the drone warfare is the best scenario they could have possibly use if they're trying to remain faithful to the original movie beacuse it's basically the same thing, difference is that we know better now how this is going to happen..

like Padilha have said, if we come to the point of using automate machines as military force, it is more reasonable to assume they're deploying them in global interventions as opposed to use them as law enforcement domestically and risking the life of their own citizen.

The way i see this is not even a change in the film's plot - it's more like having a better notion about that subject matter and make use of the current drone debate to make the story they're telling more grounded.

Iran is just a perfect choice as well since the tension between us and iran have escalated more and more in the past years and since the movie happens in the future it's better to avoid the afghanistan - pakistan theme and try to come up with a possible conflict scenario based on a growing crisis scenario that's happening in the present.

[artuditu]

Seriously, Iran is the worst possible choice, it's almost 3 times the size of Afghanistan and 4 times the size of Iraq, it has more than 2 times the population of those countries, the economy is much more developed.

An invasion and occupation of Iran by the USA would need an investment of money and human lives that USA has not known since the last World War, the American economy would suffer a major blow, and oil international prices would peak as never known before (Iran is the second OPEC exporter in the world), not to talk about Iran being neighbour to the other giant muslim state, Pakistan, a nuclear power with almost 200 million people that could support and feed all kind of resistance and terrorist groups in Iran together with other already experienced Taliban afghans and Iraqi neighbours.

It's not a coincidence that Iran (ancient Persia), unlike all of its neighbours, never became a colony of any western power in the 19th and 20th century. I'm confident any serious geopolitik analyst in the CIA knows that a direct war against Iran would be a disaster for american and world economy, and it's not an issue to take lightly.

IMHO if Robo2014 want to play the Middle East card, they should go for the nameless/abstract middle-east country, as for example they did in videogame Metal Gear Solid 4, if I'm not wrong.

[Joined]

Seriously, Iran is the worst possible choice, it's almost 3 times the size of Afghanistan and 4 times the size of Iraq, it has more than 2 times the population of those countries, the economy is much more developed.

An invasion and occupation of Iran by the USA would need an investment of money and human lives that USA has not known since the last World War, the American economy would suffer a major blow, and oil international prices would peak as never known before (Iran is the second OPEC exporter in the world), not to talk about Iran being neighbour to the other giant muslim state, Pakistan, a nuclear power with almost 200 million people that could support and feed all kind of resistance and terrorist groups in Iran together with other already experienced Taliban afghans and Iraqi neighbours.

It's not a coincidence that Iran (ancient Persia), unlike all of its neighbours, never became a colony of any western power in the 19th and 20th century. I'm confident any serious geopolitik analyst in the CIA knows that a direct war against Iran would be a disaster for american and world economy, and it's not an issue to take lightly.

IMHO if Robo2014 want to play the Middle East card, they should go for the nameless/abstract middle-east country, as for example they did in videogame Metal Gear Solid 4, if I'm not wrong.

[Post Count]

Seriously, Iran is the worst possible choice, it's almost 3 times the size of Afghanistan and 4 times the size of Iraq, it has more than 2 times the population of those countries, the economy is much more developed.

An invasion and occupation of Iran by the USA would need an investment of money and human lives that USA has not known since the last World War, the American economy would suffer a major blow, and oil international prices would peak as never known before (Iran is the second OPEC exporter in the world), not to talk about Iran being neighbour to the other giant muslim state, Pakistan, a nuclear power with almost 200 million people that could support and feed all kind of resistance and terrorist groups in Iran together with other already experienced Taliban afghans and Iraqi neighbours.

It's not a coincidence that Iran (ancient Persia), unlike all of its neighbours, never became a colony of any western power in the 19th and 20th century. I'm confident any serious geopolitik analyst in the CIA knows that a direct war against Iran would be a disaster for american and world economy, and it's not an issue to take lightly.

IMHO if Robo2014 want to play the Middle East card, they should go for the nameless/abstract middle-east country, as for example they did in videogame Metal Gear Solid 4, if I'm not wrong.

[Comment]

Seriously, Iran is the worst possible choice, it's almost 3 times the size of Afghanistan and 4 times the size of Iraq, it has more than 2 times the population of those countries, the economy is much more developed.

An invasion and occupation of Iran by the USA would need an investment of money and human lives that USA has not known since the last World War, the American economy would suffer a major blow, and oil international prices would peak as never known before (Iran is the second OPEC exporter in the world), not to talk about Iran being neighbour to the other giant muslim state, Pakistan, a nuclear power with almost 200 million people that could support and feed all kind of resistance and terrorist groups in Iran together with other already experienced Taliban afghans and Iraqi neighbours.

It's not a coincidence that Iran (ancient Persia), unlike all of its neighbours, never became a colony of any western power in the 19th and 20th century. I'm confident any serious geopolitik analyst in the CIA knows that a direct war against Iran would be a disaster for american and world economy, and it's not an issue to take lightly.

IMHO if Robo2014 want to play the Middle East card, they should go for the nameless/abstract middle-east country, as for example they did in videogame Metal Gear Solid 4, if I'm not wrong.

[Saasouza]

[Joined]

[Post Count]

[beer]

He Guys, you two above me! very good conversations!

Keep up the good conversation Saasouza and artuditu!

[Joined]

He Guys, you two above me! very good conversations!

Keep up the good conversation Saasouza and artuditu!

[Post Count]

He Guys, you two above me! very good conversations!

Keep up the good conversation Saasouza and artuditu!

[Comment]

He Guys, you two above me! very good conversations!

Keep up the good conversation Saasouza and artuditu!

[Saasouza]

[Joined]

[Post Count]

[Stan The Man]

I think the above conversations veer a bit away from the main point, but they are good posts nevertheless. I'm pretty much with artu, though I think Seasouza makes a good point that the use of automatons and machines could be a key point that reduces risk, time and costs or at least increases odds. Plus the 'future' setting does allow them to fictionalize details - in R2014 the 'near future' Iran could be much weaker strategically-speaking, much like how the US was more vulnerable in the alternate 1980s of the original Red Dawn, and so forth. Bah. Just a thought.

Mexico and South Africa in the original film were just 'two-steps more' themes coming off of what was presently going on - there were plenty of problems and shit going on in South Africa and throughout Central America at the time. Of course it's ridiculous nowadays but it was a decent interpolation to make then. Who knows, the Middle East situations might be less sensitive in 20-odd years than now and people watching the remake then might think it's silly too. Who knows? Again though, I still think they could have gone for something more ambiguous, possibly even a weird choice to make it more over-the-top and absurd. But thats just me.

Back to what Raymond said, there are indeed events/situations that occur can lead to a delay in release of trailers or even whole films. Many films ended up getting pushed back on their releases when 9/11 occurred - The Hunted with Benicio del Toro and Tommy Lee Jones is a good example, it was slated for release in '01, but was pushed back when 9/11 happened and didn't come out 'til a year or maybe two after.

That said, I don't really agree with such decisions and I really don't think that is the case here though. They just need to put something out already. We're dyin' out here, even the fools who hate this damn thing. :roll:
_________________
I don't wanna pay that, PhotoBucket. Now maybe you haven't heard, but I'm the guy in old Archive. So hows about you just shit snow for a year and I'll figure out something else. Sayonara!

[Joined]

I think the above conversations veer a bit away from the main point, but they are good posts nevertheless. I'm pretty much with artu, though I think Seasouza makes a good point that the use of automatons and machines could be a key point that reduces risk, time and costs or at least increases odds. Plus the 'future' setting does allow them to fictionalize details - in R2014 the 'near future' Iran could be much weaker strategically-speaking, much like how the US was more vulnerable in the alternate 1980s of the original Red Dawn, and so forth. Bah. Just a thought.

Mexico and South Africa in the original film were just 'two-steps more' themes coming off of what was presently going on - there were plenty of problems and shit going on in South Africa and throughout Central America at the time. Of course it's ridiculous nowadays but it was a decent interpolation to make then. Who knows, the Middle East situations might be less sensitive in 20-odd years than now and people watching the remake then might think it's silly too. Who knows? Again though, I still think they could have gone for something more ambiguous, possibly even a weird choice to make it more over-the-top and absurd. But thats just me.

Back to what Raymond said, there are indeed events/situations that occur can lead to a delay in release of trailers or even whole films. Many films ended up getting pushed back on their releases when 9/11 occurred - The Hunted with Benicio del Toro and Tommy Lee Jones is a good example, it was slated for release in '01, but was pushed back when 9/11 happened and didn't come out 'til a year or maybe two after.

That said, I don't really agree with such decisions and I really don't think that is the case here though. They just need to put something out already. We're dyin' out here, even the fools who hate this damn thing. :roll:
_________________
I don't wanna pay that, PhotoBucket. Now maybe you haven't heard, but I'm the guy in old Archive. So hows about you just shit snow for a year and I'll figure out something else. Sayonara!

[Post Count]

I think the above conversations veer a bit away from the main point, but they are good posts nevertheless. I'm pretty much with artu, though I think Seasouza makes a good point that the use of automatons and machines could be a key point that reduces risk, time and costs or at least increases odds. Plus the 'future' setting does allow them to fictionalize details - in R2014 the 'near future' Iran could be much weaker strategically-speaking, much like how the US was more vulnerable in the alternate 1980s of the original Red Dawn, and so forth. Bah. Just a thought.

Mexico and South Africa in the original film were just 'two-steps more' themes coming off of what was presently going on - there were plenty of problems and shit going on in South Africa and throughout Central America at the time. Of course it's ridiculous nowadays but it was a decent interpolation to make then. Who knows, the Middle East situations might be less sensitive in 20-odd years than now and people watching the remake then might think it's silly too. Who knows? Again though, I still think they could have gone for something more ambiguous, possibly even a weird choice to make it more over-the-top and absurd. But thats just me.

Back to what Raymond said, there are indeed events/situations that occur can lead to a delay in release of trailers or even whole films. Many films ended up getting pushed back on their releases when 9/11 occurred - The Hunted with Benicio del Toro and Tommy Lee Jones is a good example, it was slated for release in '01, but was pushed back when 9/11 happened and didn't come out 'til a year or maybe two after.

That said, I don't really agree with such decisions and I really don't think that is the case here though. They just need to put something out already. We're dyin' out here, even the fools who hate this damn thing. :roll:
_________________
I don't wanna pay that, PhotoBucket. Now maybe you haven't heard, but I'm the guy in old Archive. So hows about you just shit snow for a year and I'll figure out something else. Sayonara!

[Comment]

I think the above conversations veer a bit away from the main point, but they are good posts nevertheless. I'm pretty much with artu, though I think Seasouza makes a good point that the use of automatons and machines could be a key point that reduces risk, time and costs or at least increases odds. Plus the 'future' setting does allow them to fictionalize details - in R2014 the 'near future' Iran could be much weaker strategically-speaking, much like how the US was more vulnerable in the alternate 1980s of the original Red Dawn, and so forth. Bah. Just a thought.

Mexico and South Africa in the original film were just 'two-steps more' themes coming off of what was presently going on - there were plenty of problems and shit going on in South Africa and throughout Central America at the time. Of course it's ridiculous nowadays but it was a decent interpolation to make then. Who knows, the Middle East situations might be less sensitive in 20-odd years than now and people watching the remake then might think it's silly too. Who knows? Again though, I still think they could have gone for something more ambiguous, possibly even a weird choice to make it more over-the-top and absurd. But thats just me.

Back to what Raymond said, there are indeed events/situations that occur can lead to a delay in release of trailers or even whole films. Many films ended up getting pushed back on their releases when 9/11 occurred - The Hunted with Benicio del Toro and Tommy Lee Jones is a good example, it was slated for release in '01, but was pushed back when 9/11 happened and didn't come out 'til a year or maybe two after.

That said, I don't really agree with such decisions and I really don't think that is the case here though. They just need to put something out already. We're dyin' out here, even the fools who hate this damn thing. :roll:
_________________
I don't wanna pay that, PhotoBucket. Now maybe you haven't heard, but I'm the guy in old Archive. So hows about you just shit snow for a year and I'll figure out something else. Sayonara!

[Saasouza]

It's confirmed - The trailer is coming friday with Riddick:

That guy in the IMDB forum working as a projectionist just confirmed he received the trailer and that it's going to be attached with Riddick. He also says he have watched it and that it looks really good.

Here's his trailer description:

"Ok! here it goes!!! like i said, i only watched it once and in a hurry because there were people waitting to get in for the next show.. I def cant do a scene by scene, but heres as much as i can remember:

The trailer Opens with a scene of a drone flying a city (appropriate for our times) that looks alot like detroit, so im assuming it was supposed to be detroit.

At some point early on in the trailer they show all kinds of drones, both walking and flying kind, the entire ocp arsenal.. then keatons character states that they want to "put a man in a machine".

What follows is something we've all already heard about.. muphy is in his house, and his car's alarm goes off.. the scnene shows him stepping out of his house and pushing the button to turn it off, but the alarm keeps going..
Confused, he keeps pushing on the button as he walks up to his car , and then when he's just a couple feet away the car blows up.

and HERE is why i said its a hard PG-13! I dont remember what was said, but theres a scene where OCP seems to be trying to convince murphys wife to allow them to do this...and she asks "what kind of life is he going to have?" ... but then theres a scene that only lasts a few seconds of murphy laying there in the hospital badly burned and with one of his legs entirely blown off! He really looks in bad shape.. in think the PG 13 ratin is a product of the times, not that the movie is missing voilence. I think this sort of thing woul've landed you a R rating in 1987, but now it doesn't because we're all mentally ill. lol

Cuts to murphy waking up, again i dont remember specific dialogue but he appears very confused as to whats this thing attached to his body.. so he's asking questions, at this point his voice already sounds robotic, but kinda like in the original, his voice sounds robotic but you can tell its still his.
The OCP doctor/scientist dude explains to him that this is not attached to him, this is his body now.. Murphy freaks the F out and says "WHAT DID YOU DO TO ME!!"

At this point his suite looks big, and menacing, and the color scheme of the original.. the show a couple of close ups, and as a fan of the original its a process to get used to it but its definately cool.... At some point they show an OCP dude saying they wannam make him look more ba-dass, and thats where the black suit comes in....

now heres what you we're waitting to hear : The suit does look a LOT better in the movie, with the lighting and everything, it looks very very weavy, i did not feel i was looking at rubber anymore.

Everything they show in the movie makes him look more lethal, more aggresive, there isnt alot of mercy left in murphy.. I guess because a big part of the plot is that he is losing his humanity.

There is a moment in the trailer where a desperate Mrs Murphy goes "YOU GOTTA TALK TO YOUR CHILD!", and then they show a surreal moment where cyborg murphy kneels down and looks at his child, but it seemed to me like he was way gone by that point.

Theres a moment where keaton explains that his program gives him the ILLUSION of free will, but its not real. They can control him.

And my favorite part: when the trailer is just about done, you hear the classic "Dead or alive, you're coming with me" in a robotic voice, but you no longer hear murphy in it.. it sounds dark, and disturbing.. which is GREAT!!!

Sorry about the lack to detail, the whole thing is very fast paced.. the movie looks violent, not gory"

Link to the IMDB forum: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1234721/board/nest/219246297?p=1

[Joined]

It's confirmed - The trailer is coming friday with Riddick:

That guy in the IMDB forum working as a projectionist just confirmed he received the trailer and that it's going to be attached with Riddick. He also says he have watched it and that it looks really good.

Here's his trailer description:

"Ok! here it goes!!! like i said, i only watched it once and in a hurry because there were people waitting to get in for the next show.. I def cant do a scene by scene, but heres as much as i can remember:

The trailer Opens with a scene of a drone flying a city (appropriate for our times) that looks alot like detroit, so im assuming it was supposed to be detroit.

At some point early on in the trailer they show all kinds of drones, both walking and flying kind, the entire ocp arsenal.. then keatons character states that they want to "put a man in a machine".

What follows is something we've all already heard about.. muphy is in his house, and his car's alarm goes off.. the scnene shows him stepping out of his house and pushing the button to turn it off, but the alarm keeps going..
Confused, he keeps pushing on the button as he walks up to his car , and then when he's just a couple feet away the car blows up.

and HERE is why i said its a hard PG-13! I dont remember what was said, but theres a scene where OCP seems to be trying to convince murphys wife to allow them to do this...and she asks "what kind of life is he going to have?" ... but then theres a scene that only lasts a few seconds of murphy laying there in the hospital badly burned and with one of his legs entirely blown off! He really looks in bad shape.. in think the PG 13 ratin is a product of the times, not that the movie is missing voilence. I think this sort of thing woul've landed you a R rating in 1987, but now it doesn't because we're all mentally ill. lol

Cuts to murphy waking up, again i dont remember specific dialogue but he appears very confused as to whats this thing attached to his body.. so he's asking questions, at this point his voice already sounds robotic, but kinda like in the original, his voice sounds robotic but you can tell its still his.
The OCP doctor/scientist dude explains to him that this is not attached to him, this is his body now.. Murphy freaks the F out and says "WHAT DID YOU DO TO ME!!"

At this point his suite looks big, and menacing, and the color scheme of the original.. the show a couple of close ups, and as a fan of the original its a process to get used to it but its definately cool.... At some point they show an OCP dude saying they wannam make him look more ba-dass, and thats where the black suit comes in....

now heres what you we're waitting to hear : The suit does look a LOT better in the movie, with the lighting and everything, it looks very very weavy, i did not feel i was looking at rubber anymore.

Everything they show in the movie makes him look more lethal, more aggresive, there isnt alot of mercy left in murphy.. I guess because a big part of the plot is that he is losing his humanity.

There is a moment in the trailer where a desperate Mrs Murphy goes "YOU GOTTA TALK TO YOUR CHILD!", and then they show a surreal moment where cyborg murphy kneels down and looks at his child, but it seemed to me like he was way gone by that point.

Theres a moment where keaton explains that his program gives him the ILLUSION of free will, but its not real. They can control him.

And my favorite part: when the trailer is just about done, you hear the classic "Dead or alive, you're coming with me" in a robotic voice, but you no longer hear murphy in it.. it sounds dark, and disturbing.. which is GREAT!!!

Sorry about the lack to detail, the whole thing is very fast paced.. the movie looks violent, not gory"

Link to the IMDB forum: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1234721/board/nest/219246297?p=1

[Post Count]

It's confirmed - The trailer is coming friday with Riddick:

That guy in the IMDB forum working as a projectionist just confirmed he received the trailer and that it's going to be attached with Riddick. He also says he have watched it and that it looks really good.

Here's his trailer description:

"Ok! here it goes!!! like i said, i only watched it once and in a hurry because there were people waitting to get in for the next show.. I def cant do a scene by scene, but heres as much as i can remember:

The trailer Opens with a scene of a drone flying a city (appropriate for our times) that looks alot like detroit, so im assuming it was supposed to be detroit.

At some point early on in the trailer they show all kinds of drones, both walking and flying kind, the entire ocp arsenal.. then keatons character states that they want to "put a man in a machine".

What follows is something we've all already heard about.. muphy is in his house, and his car's alarm goes off.. the scnene shows him stepping out of his house and pushing the button to turn it off, but the alarm keeps going..
Confused, he keeps pushing on the button as he walks up to his car , and then when he's just a couple feet away the car blows up.

and HERE is why i said its a hard PG-13! I dont remember what was said, but theres a scene where OCP seems to be trying to convince murphys wife to allow them to do this...and she asks "what kind of life is he going to have?" ... but then theres a scene that only lasts a few seconds of murphy laying there in the hospital badly burned and with one of his legs entirely blown off! He really looks in bad shape.. in think the PG 13 ratin is a product of the times, not that the movie is missing voilence. I think this sort of thing woul've landed you a R rating in 1987, but now it doesn't because we're all mentally ill. lol

Cuts to murphy waking up, again i dont remember specific dialogue but he appears very confused as to whats this thing attached to his body.. so he's asking questions, at this point his voice already sounds robotic, but kinda like in the original, his voice sounds robotic but you can tell its still his.
The OCP doctor/scientist dude explains to him that this is not attached to him, this is his body now.. Murphy freaks the F out and says "WHAT DID YOU DO TO ME!!"

At this point his suite looks big, and menacing, and the color scheme of the original.. the show a couple of close ups, and as a fan of the original its a process to get used to it but its definately cool.... At some point they show an OCP dude saying they wannam make him look more ba-dass, and thats where the black suit comes in....

now heres what you we're waitting to hear : The suit does look a LOT better in the movie, with the lighting and everything, it looks very very weavy, i did not feel i was looking at rubber anymore.

Everything they show in the movie makes him look more lethal, more aggresive, there isnt alot of mercy left in murphy.. I guess because a big part of the plot is that he is losing his humanity.

There is a moment in the trailer where a desperate Mrs Murphy goes "YOU GOTTA TALK TO YOUR CHILD!", and then they show a surreal moment where cyborg murphy kneels down and looks at his child, but it seemed to me like he was way gone by that point.

Theres a moment where keaton explains that his program gives him the ILLUSION of free will, but its not real. They can control him.

And my favorite part: when the trailer is just about done, you hear the classic "Dead or alive, you're coming with me" in a robotic voice, but you no longer hear murphy in it.. it sounds dark, and disturbing.. which is GREAT!!!

Sorry about the lack to detail, the whole thing is very fast paced.. the movie looks violent, not gory"

Link to the IMDB forum: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1234721/board/nest/219246297?p=1

[Raymond]

Sounds absolutely awesome with the exception of the car explosion thing.

Should have kept it like in the script. The point of doing it in a controlled way was to not risk damaging the brain etc. Explosion? that could go really wrong. Or maybe Omnicorp was cold enough to try it with more police officers if it had backfired with Murphy.


But the positive thing is the trailer seems to include the drones, multiple versions of the suit, the voice, violence etc etc.

Can't wait

[Joined]

Sounds absolutely awesome with the exception of the car explosion thing.

Should have kept it like in the script. The point of doing it in a controlled way was to not risk damaging the brain etc. Explosion? that could go really wrong. Or maybe Omnicorp was cold enough to try it with more police officers if it had backfired with Murphy.


But the positive thing is the trailer seems to include the drones, multiple versions of the suit, the voice, violence etc etc.

Can't wait

[Post Count]

Sounds absolutely awesome with the exception of the car explosion thing.

Should have kept it like in the script. The point of doing it in a controlled way was to not risk damaging the brain etc. Explosion? that could go really wrong. Or maybe Omnicorp was cold enough to try it with more police officers if it had backfired with Murphy.


But the positive thing is the trailer seems to include the drones, multiple versions of the suit, the voice, violence etc etc.

Can't wait

[Art Intellect]

Remember I broke the story first for the trailer attached to Riddick..... Please give me some recognition

Check the blog History for details

[Joined]

Remember I broke the story first for the trailer attached to Riddick..... Please give me some recognition

Check the blog History for details

[Post Count]

Remember I broke the story first for the trailer attached to Riddick..... Please give me some recognition

Check the blog History for details